<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Scriptbloggers &#187; domaining</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scriptbloggers.com/category/domaining/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scriptbloggers.com</link>
	<description>Blogging about scripts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 16:49:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Dynadot is down, Yahoo! mail is down and I&#8217;m going crazy!</title>
		<link>http://www.scriptbloggers.com/2009/03/02/dynadot-is-down-yahoo-mail-is-down-and-im-going-crazy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scriptbloggers.com/2009/03/02/dynadot-is-down-yahoo-mail-is-down-and-im-going-crazy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 21:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>soroush</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domaining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[noteworthy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scriptbloggers.com/?p=169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[UPDATE: Well, I guess by now, everybody knows that Dynadot is back up after more than 36 hours of downtime, that&#8217;s a good thing but I still can&#8217;t believe they have just left it with no announcement, no explanation and no apology like it has never happened! I could understand if it was 2-3 hour [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scriptbloggers.com/2009/03/02/dynadot-is-down-yahoo-mail-is-down-and-im-going-crazy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dot ME domains overvalued</title>
		<link>http://www.scriptbloggers.com/2008/08/05/dot-me-domains-overvalued/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scriptbloggers.com/2008/08/05/dot-me-domains-overvalued/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 19:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>soroush</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[domaining]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scriptbloggers.com/?p=122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Like a lot of other domainers I&#8217;ve also placed my orders on a few dot ME (.me) domains in Pre-Registration period. None of them were successful but one which resulted in an auction which has been started July 28, 2008. On the third day I found the price way over my budget for that domain [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scriptbloggers.com/2008/08/05/dot-me-domains-overvalued/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google AdSense for domains, Interesting but &#8230;.?!</title>
		<link>http://www.scriptbloggers.com/2008/08/03/google-adsense-for-domains-interesting-but/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scriptbloggers.com/2008/08/03/google-adsense-for-domains-interesting-but/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 19:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>soroush</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[domaining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[noteworthy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scriptbloggers.com/?p=117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, I finally decided to do something with all my unused domains till I either develop a website on them or sell them for the right price. They were mostly just registered and left pointed to the registrar&#8217;s default nameservers, forwarding visitors to a parking page which is in favor of the registrars more than [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scriptbloggers.com/2008/08/03/google-adsense-for-domains-interesting-but/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>isimtescil.net a shameless SCAM!</title>
		<link>http://www.scriptbloggers.com/2008/07/04/isimtescilnet-a-shameless-scam/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scriptbloggers.com/2008/07/04/isimtescilnet-a-shameless-scam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 17:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>soroush</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[domaining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[noteworthy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scriptbloggers.com/?p=105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last year I bought some domains from someone on DP and unfortunately they were registered at isimtescil.net which is a Turkish registrar. I just asked him to open an account for me and transfer the domains to my account. I logged into my account, changed their name servers and turned all those domains to blogs [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scriptbloggers.com/2008/07/04/isimtescilnet-a-shameless-scam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does Registerfly sell their customer&#8217;s info for spamming purposes?!</title>
		<link>http://www.scriptbloggers.com/2008/02/02/does-registerfly-sell-their-customers-info-for-spamming-purposes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scriptbloggers.com/2008/02/02/does-registerfly-sell-their-customers-info-for-spamming-purposes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 00:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>soroush</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[domaining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[noteworthy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scriptbloggers.com/2008/02/02/does-registerfly-sell-their-customers-info-for-spamming-purposes/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s a big legal issue and I can&#8217;t speak for sure &#8217;cause it&#8217;s a big responsibility but I leave the judgment to the readers and wait to hear other similar situations to make sure. After all even if that&#8217;s true, I think there&#8217;s nothing we can do like all other spammers. First of all I [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scriptbloggers.com/2008/02/02/does-registerfly-sell-their-customers-info-for-spamming-purposes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yes! I finally won the auction&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.scriptbloggers.com/2008/01/18/yes-i-finally-won-the-auction/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scriptbloggers.com/2008/01/18/yes-i-finally-won-the-auction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 05:12:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>soroush</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domaining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[my projects]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scriptbloggers.com/2008/01/18/yes-i-finally-won-the-auction/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So as I promised before, I&#8217;m gonna disclose the domain name that I won in Namejet&#8217;s auction mentioned here and here. It might not be interesting to many of you but I&#8217;ve always had big hopes for a kind of website and this domain is just great for the purpose in my head, specially because [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scriptbloggers.com/2008/01/18/yes-i-finally-won-the-auction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NameJet won the battle</title>
		<link>http://www.scriptbloggers.com/2008/01/15/namejet-won-the-battle/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scriptbloggers.com/2008/01/15/namejet-won-the-battle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 00:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>soroush</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[domaining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[noteworthy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scriptbloggers.com/2008/01/15/namejet-won-the-battle/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you&#8217;re new, here is the Beginning of the story And yes! It looks like my assumption was correct! 5 O&#8217;clock in the evening and I received an email from Snapnames: Registration attempts for back-ordered domain names were unsuccessful Logged in to my account and checked my back-ordered domain list and the domain was still [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scriptbloggers.com/2008/01/15/namejet-won-the-battle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pool, Snapnames or NameJet</title>
		<link>http://www.scriptbloggers.com/2008/01/14/pool-snapnames-or-namejet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scriptbloggers.com/2008/01/14/pool-snapnames-or-namejet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 05:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>soroush</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[domaining]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scriptbloggers.com/2008/01/14/pool-snapnames-or-namejet/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From what I&#8217;ve heard and what I experienced so far, the best place to back-order on an expiring domain name, depends on the registrar but this time I&#8217;m experiencing it closer than ever. I&#8217;ve back-ordered on a domain name, releasing tomorrow, in all 3, Pool.com, Snapnames.com and NameJet.com websites. The domain is registered at eNom [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scriptbloggers.com/2008/01/14/pool-snapnames-or-namejet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alternative options for Overture Keyword Selector Tool</title>
		<link>http://www.scriptbloggers.com/2008/01/06/alternative-options-for-overture-keyword-selector-tool/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scriptbloggers.com/2008/01/06/alternative-options-for-overture-keyword-selector-tool/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 05:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>soroush</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domaining]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scriptbloggers.com/2008/01/06/alternative-options-for-overture-keyword-selector-tool/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As many of you know, Overture keyword selector tool located at &#8220;inventory.overture.com&#8221; without doubt, was one of the most useful tools (if not the most) for webmasters, domainers and SEO and SEM professionals for years, returning a useful and detailed report for free. I was definitely one of the regular users enjoying this great free [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scriptbloggers.com/2008/01/06/alternative-options-for-overture-keyword-selector-tool/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ideas needed</title>
		<link>http://www.scriptbloggers.com/2007/07/26/ideas-needed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scriptbloggers.com/2007/07/26/ideas-needed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 23:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>soroush</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Soroush's Cash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domaining]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scriptbloggers.com/2007/07/26/ideas-needed/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi there, I really need help and suggestions on one of my brilliant domains getting around 120 visitors a month and even earning couple of bucks a month from clicks it gets on sedo parking page. The reason I parked it at sedo wasn’t the rev, it was just because it&#8217;s the easiest way to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scriptbloggers.com/2007/07/26/ideas-needed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
